Paramount Plus Trial

Wednesday, November 26, 2014

Big Brother Australia vs. Big Brother on CBS

I expect to miss #BBAU 2014 after its season finale a lot more than I have missed #BB16. These two shows share the Big Brother name and the concept of putting 16 people together in a house for three months with weekly evictions until a winner is selected -- but that’s where the similarities end. Big Brother Australia and the American version of Big Brother on CBS are wholly different shows.

Big Brother Australia logo. Catchy animation on TV, too.As you know, I’m the Newbie Desk writer here, and to date I have watched only three Big Brother seasons: #BB15 and #BB16 on CBS, and Big Brother Australia 2014 (via this YouTube playlist). #BBAU 2014’s season finale airs in Australia's prime time about 30 minutes from when I’m writing this (at about 4:00 AM Eastern). I’ve been promising to write this post since #BB16 ended -- no spoilers here if you’ve been watching #BBAU.

The obvious up-front disclaimer is this: Reasonable people will disagree on matters of taste. That said, here’s my judgment: Big Brother Australia is by far the better show. I’m told that #BB1 (that is, the first season of the CBS show) used a format very similar to #BBAU’s but that CBS judged it needed to be tweaked (*cough* ruined) to be more palatable to American audiences. And then even the revised format devolved over the years into the formulaic #BB16 debacle about which my fellow contributors on this site wrote so much.

#BBAU's auditorium is huge, colorful, and full of excited people. The host and housemates enter through the "eye" in back and walk the catwalk through the audience to the stage. CBS, pay attention. If you're going to bother with a live audience, do it the way #BBAU does.Even if you don’t agree that #BB16 was predictable and boring, perhaps you might think it worthwhile to learn about an alternate Big Brother format which viewers in other English-speaking countries seem to enjoy. So here’s a #BBAU primer. First, let’s talk about the rules of the game. Later, we’ll discuss the content of the show’s TV episodes.

In Australia, the viewers cast eviction votes, not the house guests -- who are actually called “housemates” there. Actually, I’m not saying this correctly. Viewers vote to save housemates every week, so the housemate receiving the fewest viewer votes is the one evicted. During the season’s final week, viewers decide the winner. In this, #BBAU is fundamentally different (and, in my view, better) than the American version. Viewer participation directly affects game outcome each and every week. Contrast that with CBS’s #BB16: Viewers voted on silly “Team America” tasks which gave certain house guests unfair prize money advantages; viewer participation had no meaningful direct relevance to game outcome, and many of us perceived it only as a total waste of time.

Example of a nomination. Here, Sam, as Head of House, has used points to reveal a few house mates' locations on the nomination board.Back in #BBAU, housemates nominate their peers for potential eviction. In private Diary Room sessions, Big Brother gives each housemate five points to split among two nominees, asking “Who do you nominate, for how many points, and why?” The week’s Head of House is the last one called to the DR during nominations. Big Brother gives him or her 10 or 12 points; the HOH may spend points to reveal the positions of housemates on the Nominations Table and may split remaining points to nominate as many housemates as s/he’d like.

All housemates who received at least 5 points are nominated for potential eviction (while those who received 4 or fewer points are safe). Big Brother informs the housemates of who the nominees are and how many points they received (but who nominated whom remains secret). Then, voting is opened. Over the next few days, viewers cast votes via text message and Facebook to save their favorite housemates; during the next one or two live shows, with her characteristic flair and with the backing of an engaged, vocal audience, host Sonia Kruger delivers her signature lines to housemates, telling them who is safe (“The nominee who received the most votes to save them is [dramatic pause] ... Skye!”) and, later, who is evicted (“It’s time to go ... [dramatic pause] ... It’s time to go, Leo!”).

Another stark difference: In #BBAU, discussing nominations is strictly forbidden. Big Brother considers such talk to be collusion; housemates are not permitted the competitive advantage that they’d achieve by talking and strategizing about who they’d like to nominate and evict. And he’s not afraid to meaningfully penalize housemates for breaking that or other rules. For example, on Day 66 this season, Big Brother gave 3 nomination points each to Priya and Skye as punishment for trying to get Travis to reveal information about his Head of House “power play.”

Sonia Kruger, #BBAU's host, is natural and charming. She knows it's entertainment and does it well. Julie Chen should take some pointers from Sonia.By forbidding talk about nominations and by giving viewers all the power as to who stays in the house, the content of all housemate conversations is wholly different in #BBAU than in the CBS show. I find watching their interactions to be much more enjoyable. Because they have been freed from directly discussing the game, housemates often talk with each other as they would in the real world. Friendships and romances emerge; differences, conflicts, and controversies emerge as well. Over the course of the season, we are afforded the opportunity to get to know each housemate as an individual person; viewers grow more attached to their favorites and are thus, at least in theory, incentivized to keep watching and to keep participating.

Big Brother gives housemates a special “task” each week to test their skills, memory, teamwork, and/or endurance. These tasks vary greatly. Just a few examples: They had to run a live radio station; they were split into hotel servants and guests; they had to physically obey commands of a giant VCR remote control (pause = freeze in place; rewind = walk & talk backwards; slow-mo, fast-forward, etc.). These tasks provide interest and humor for viewers and conversation fodder for the housemates. If they pass the task, Big Brother gives them a higher budget for food; if they fail, supplies of luxury food items (and sometimes staples) are constrained. Although these weekly tasks have little relevance on game outcome, they are far more effective than the CBS version’s “haves & have-nots” at providing entertaining content for each week’s TV episodes.

Sonia shows viewers the point spread between their "votes to save."This brings me to the episodes themselves.  I find #BBAU’s episodes to be far less formulaic than the CBS show’s episodes. Although live episodes do have a predictable structure (recap, save some people, evict some people, interview the evictees), I have generally found something surprising and entertaining in each of this season’s 50+ episodes. Each episode unfolds organically based on the events of the day or days covered; the people are real and unscripted; moments of pure joy happen regularly.

I could not say the same about #BB15 or #BB16 on CBS. Episodes focus on competitions (most of which are predictable retreads of those used in previous seasons), ceremonies (nomination, power of veto, eviction, even HOH room reveals), and interpersonal conflict caused by artificial game-based situations. Diary Room sessions are highly scripted; there, house guests serve more as program hosts than players; rare is the genuine personal moment.

The #BBAU house is at the very top; the auditorium is in the middle left; the rest of the Dreamworld theme park is at the bottom.#BBAU’s live shows are a visual feast! Hosted by the effervescent Sonia Kruger, most live episodes begin with a unique, custom-produced open before the up-tempo theme music rolls while Sonia strolls down a catwalk to the cheers of hundreds in the audience. The broadcast originates from the Big Brother auditorium at Dreamworld, Australia’s largest theme park. Dazzling computer-generated graphics surround the audience. Sonia and the housemates enter through an elevated Big Brother “eye” and walk through the cheering fans to the center of another “eye” embedded in the floor of a huge stage backed by a giant screen used for video playback, graphics, and live views of the Big Brother house.

Live shows air twice weekly; there are two to four additional non-live shows each week which summarize what happened in the house since the last episode. It is through these “daily shows” that viewers get to know the housemates so well. Since Australia is 16 or more hours ahead of every U.S. time zone, I could count on every new #BBAU episode being ready for me to watch on-line as soon as I got home from work. It became my daily habit to watch it while making dinner. #BBAU does not offer live Internet feeds, so the four to six weekly episodes became the equivalent.

Although I do not dislike Julie Chen, I find Sonia Kruger to be a far more entertaining host. She handles the large audience with ease. Every interaction with the housemates comes across as natural and conversational. I’m not sure whether this is due to pure talent, the use of a teleprompter (rather than Julie’s cue cards), both, or neither. Sonia’s simply better in this role. (Sorry, Julie.)

Big Brother (and by this I mean the “person,” the all-seeing disembodied voice who controls housemates’ lives) is highly interactive, too. He talks with the housemates, not just at them. He is quick with humor and sarcasm. In the Diary Room, he asks probing questions and responds directly to what the housemates say to him. Big Brother talks to housemates in groups or individually wherever they may be, not merely in the Diary Room. He’s cheeky and highly entertaining. This interactivity is a huge part of what makes #BBAU so fun to watch (and so different, in a very positive way, from the CBS version).

Producers do clearly steer the show in Australia. I get the impression that CBS wants us to think they’re hands-off, but what happens instead is that we see them interfering at exactly the wrong times and for the wrong reasons. #BBAU episodes usually strike me as fresh; significant changes to the game, such as the introduction of “intruders” (new mid-season housemates), are obviously producer-controlled but I felt like such things happened at the right times.

By the way, unlike the CBS house, the #BBAU house itself is not physically connected to the auditorium; it’s about a quarter mile away down a wooded road through the back area of the Dreamworld property. I’m not a good judge of square footage, but I think it’s bigger than the American house —- perhaps significantly so. There’s a large swimming pool (perhaps three or four times the size of the CBS house’s pool) and hot tub in a large astroturf-covered front courtyard, and it’s flanked by a private “treehouse,” gym, laundry room, and outdoor grill. The kitchen and large dining room are in their own annex.

Inside the house, there’s a “lounge” (living room), two bedrooms, a huge bathroom with a 4-person communal shower and several sinks, an adjacent “parlour” (a luxury spa with two soaking tubs and numerous makeover tables), the “Power Room” into which Big Brother invites housemates for special rewards and projects, an adjacent task room which producers repurpose several times throughout the season, and, of course, the Diary Room (which for 2014 has been moved to a newly-built second level, the first time #BBAU's house has had two stories). Connected to the main house via a corridor off of the outdoor courtyard is the Sanctuary, a luxury apartment with its own pool, living/bedroom, and bathroom with soaking tub; Big Brother rewards the Head of House and his/her choice of guest, or some times other housemates, with overnight stays in the private Sanctuary.

Just because I find so much to like about Big Brother Australia does not mean I won’t tune in for #BB17 on CBS next year. But I think CBS could borrow some ideas from #BBAU to improve its own product without making it unrecognizable. How? That’s what I’ll write about next time.

Have you been watching Big Brother Australia 2014? What do you think of it? In what ways do you think it's better (or worse) than Big Brother on CBS here in the States? Comment below or @uselesstraffic.


  1. I have Big Brother Gossip to thank for getting me hooked on BBAu! I started watching 2013 this summer, am watching 2012 now, and have been following along with the 2014 season. I agree with you that it is far superior to the US version!
    The absolute best thing about the Australian show is that Big Brother is a presence in the house, and diary room sessions are unscripted conversations between the housemate and BB. In seasons 2013 and 2014, you can tell there is a real rapport and affection between BB and the housemates (BB in 2012 seems much more stern and humorless.) Housemates seek out BB to discuss what they are thinking and feeling. In the US version, the live feeds show that the house guests find their diary room sessions as dull and tedious as we do, and refer to the people they talk to as "production" rather than Big Brother. With Big Brother as a confidante, the Australian housemates can show their true selves, unlike the scripted and edited characters that are the US house guests.
    I'm not sure if I like that the public has the ultimate power to evict (or not save) in BBAu. This takes away all need for strategic play in the house. The housemates are basically all floaters, and we just watch them jump through BB's hoops while they are picked off one by one. Since the public's favorites are made obvious by who they save, and by the live audience's cheering, the likely winners become apparent long before the finale. (I haven't watched the 2014 finale yet, but the 3 finalists are 3 of the 4 possible winners I picked before the "neighbors" were introduced, and are the 3 I expected to see in the finale once David was evicted. Season 2013's winner was obvious even earlier, the only surprise being that viewers chose the bland 2nd place finalist over the funny, vibrant 3rd place finalist.) I miss the conniving and sudden shifts of power that the US version has.
    BBAu also has some of the weaknesses of BBUS, namely twists that are dropped too soon and recycled challenges. Season 2013's fantastic divided house twist was abandoned after what, 3 weeks? And season 2014's partners twist only lasted one eviction. 2013's fun Showdown that decided Head of House was dropped this year for boring viewer-chosen Heads of House. As for the challenges, while I LOVE the remote control/freeze challenge (cried my eyes out watching 2013's Tahan stand "frozen" while her mom and little sister were allowed to visit!) and I like the "Yes Big Brother challenge, I can't stand the form-a-pop-group challenge, and fast-forward through the radio station and Santa's helpers challenges.

    Other likes: nominations points, the house pets, "Surly" giving secret individual challenges, the big yard that gives the housemates things to do other than sit on the couch all day, "intruders" that shake up the house dynamics, surprise evictions, housemates having to earn their food budgets and decide on a shopping list, family members doing nominations one week, housemates forbidden to discuss nominations.

  2. kaycee14, thanks for posting. You've provided great food for thought -- and you clearly write with well-educated opinions about both the Australian and American versions of the show. I didn't think to mention in my article that it did occur to me that #BBAU is so fresh to me due to my not having (yet) seen previous seasons ... so I don't realize when certain challenges are recycled from previous years (which is obviously one of our complaints about the CBS show). So it would be fair to say that "recycling" is a complaint which potentially applies to both shows.

    It's interesting to me that you aren't entirely keen on viewers having power over who stays and who goes. I guess my own opinion could still be swayed; it's just that I find the endlessly unanimous eviction votes on the CBS show to be so predictable and boring that I gravitate toward ANY system which is different. During #BBAU 2014, at least for the first two-thirds of the season, I was constantly surprised by the public's choices -- and the unpredictability was a key factor in why I found every live episode to be so entertaining.

    You're right that the CBS version definitely has more conniving and sudden power shifts -- which has appeal for viewers. I guess my response is that #BB16 had some level of conniving but rarely had power shifts, given Derrick's firm control all season long. At least #BB15 had some shifting of power between Amanda's allies and Helen's allies.

    I like that #BBAU seemingly provides so much more opportunity to get to know the housemates as individual people, not just game players and strategists. How could #BBAU's format be tweaked to provide more game-related conversation (and the resulting conniving and shifts of power)? Perhaps Big Brother should grant more opportunities to talk out loud about the game? I only remember him providing a couple such opportunities during #BBAU 2014 -- a couple of times in the treehouse. (Maybe there were more but they weren't televised.)

    One last comment: Indy Mike has been encouraging me to watch #BBAU 2013. Like you, he feels it was a better season. I've just started with episode 1 and am looking forward to it (even though I already know who won).

  3. Target John, you will LOVE BBAu 2013! Enjoy!

  4. I started listening to the Big Brother Gossip podcast this year and I love it! I started watching BBAU this year as well. I watched season 2014 first and went back and watched 2013. I have to say that I like season 2014 way better than 2013 and I like the Australian version WAY more than the American version. I can't wait to see the 2015 season, but I have heard that there may not be a 2015 season to allow Sonya Kreuger time off to have her baby. Have you any updates?